<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Hard Just to Be A Star&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adaruby.com/2006/12/22/so-hard-just-to-be-a-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adaruby.com/2006/12/22/so-hard-just-to-be-a-star/</link>
	<description>Rich Dynamic Applications with Ruby on Rails</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:49:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendy Irawan</title>
		<link>http://www.adaruby.com/2006/12/22/so-hard-just-to-be-a-star/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendy Irawan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adaruby.com/2006/12/22/so-hard-just-to-be-a-star/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Ariel, yeah, I agree.

Hardware is always getting cheaper, and better in quality (at least in performance, not durability). Software doesn&#039;t always seem to be. They suck more (especially memory and CPU) overtime.

Why spend too much money on these stuff, when you don&#039;t really know what good can it do to you? (if you invest on something you better know how it will produce money for you after that)

I don&#039;t see how buying a $15,000 Vista-loaded laptop (and more $$$ for Office, Adobe products and stuff) will &lt;strong&gt;certainly&lt;/strong&gt; give you more income than a $600 ordinary laptop with Ubuntu + all FLOSS software that you can get on the Ubuntu distro + the Internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ariel, yeah, I agree.</p>
<p>Hardware is always getting cheaper, and better in quality (at least in performance, not durability). Software doesn&#8217;t always seem to be. They suck more (especially memory and CPU) overtime.</p>
<p>Why spend too much money on these stuff, when you don&#8217;t really know what good can it do to you? (if you invest on something you better know how it will produce money for you after that)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how buying a $15,000 Vista-loaded laptop (and more $$$ for Office, Adobe products and stuff) will <strong>certainly</strong> give you more income than a $600 ordinary laptop with Ubuntu + all FLOSS software that you can get on the Ubuntu distro + the Internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel M.</title>
		<link>http://www.adaruby.com/2006/12/22/so-hard-just-to-be-a-star/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adaruby.com/2006/12/22/so-hard-just-to-be-a-star/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>I met someone&#039;s friend last saturday at a local computer store who works in Dell. I was just mentioning to a friend a real low pricer Acer laptop with 256 megabytes of RAM. The guy from Dell, who did not know 256 is enough for Linux and Gnome, mentioned casually:

- That&#039;s not good! You need at least 1 gigabyte for Windows XP, and 2 gigabytes if you plan to run Vista!

Even in Linux, you can never have too much RAM. But I am not planning on Vista anything for a long while. I have nothing against Microsoft though, I think they have a nice product and it&#039;s part of the price I pay for a computer. But when I can get a discount for a non-OS machine, be sure I will prefer a virgin HD and my latest Ubuntu installation CD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met someone&#8217;s friend last saturday at a local computer store who works in Dell. I was just mentioning to a friend a real low pricer Acer laptop with 256 megabytes of RAM. The guy from Dell, who did not know 256 is enough for Linux and Gnome, mentioned casually:</p>
<p>- That&#8217;s not good! You need at least 1 gigabyte for Windows XP, and 2 gigabytes if you plan to run Vista!</p>
<p>Even in Linux, you can never have too much RAM. But I am not planning on Vista anything for a long while. I have nothing against Microsoft though, I think they have a nice product and it&#8217;s part of the price I pay for a computer. But when I can get a discount for a non-OS machine, be sure I will prefer a virgin HD and my latest Ubuntu installation CD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
